So, the NEW WORLD ORDER was not a conspiracy theory after all and given Ireland’s compliant obedient or captured occupation regime in power, they will be in front of the queue to signup to the One World Order! The world supremacist United Nations and its greedy Multinational sponsors have schemed and planned and goaded and manipulated and bribed over the last few years, culminating in acceptance of their contract with the devil on December 11, 2018 in Marrakech, Morocco. where all our treasonous leaders will sign over authority for all our country’s borders, to the United Nations.
In true Liberal World Order deceptive double speak it uses overt virtue signalling and fear porn to goad our compromised leaders into signing away our inherited rights! They have mixed Asylum and Migration to destroy our borders and invade our countries with their zombie apocalypse, so they can then offer their Global One World Government as a solution!
DEMAND A REFERENDUM IN YOUR COUNTRY NOW!
US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said it would “undermine” the U.S.’s sovereign rights. The U.S. is not alone in rejecting this world supremacist compact. Australia, Austria, Hungary, and Croatia have rejected it completely, while the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia and Italy signaled they are likely to withdraw. Already AfD is fighting against it in Germany.
Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz in a statement cited “the mixing up of seeking protection with labor migration,” while Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, at a Tuesday news conference in Warsaw, cited “sovereign principles on securing our borders and controlling migration flows.”
“There are many issues with the compact, both legal and political,” said Matt Pinsker, professor of International Law at Virginia Commonwealth University.
Pinsker said that, legally, the compact contains ambiguous language which could cause political problems, for instance enabling proponents to pass domestic legislation on the grounds their nation has a moral, legal and/or international obligation under the compact.
“Its ambiguous language can be defined in any way politicians or activists find most convenient, and would use it to push extreme policies,” he said. “Signing to the compact has many risks as it exposes nations and lawmakers politically while offering few if any practical benefits.”